Solar Panel Efficiency Calculator

Compare monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin-film output per panel — at any irradiance level.

%
W/m²
Panel output at 1000 W/m²
387.0 W per panel
Output at STC (1,000 W/m²)387.0 W
Technology comparison at 1.8 m², 1000 W/m²
TechnologyEfficiencyOutput (W)Temp coeff
Monocrystalline21.5%387.0-0.35%/°C
Polycrystalline17%306.0-0.4%/°C
Thin-film13%234.0-0.25%/°C
Link copied to clipboard

How to Use This Calculator

Select your panel type

Choose monocrystalline, polycrystalline, or thin-film. Selecting a type automatically fills in a typical efficiency for that technology — you can override it with your specific panel's rated efficiency from the manufacturer's spec sheet. The comparison table always shows all three technologies side by side at your entered panel area and irradiance.

Enter panel area

Input the physical panel area in square meters. Standard residential panels range from 1.7 m² (60-cell format) to 2.0 m² (72-cell format). Modern large-format panels can be up to 2.4 m². Check your panel's datasheet — look for "module dimensions" and multiply length × width, then convert from mm to meters.

Set efficiency and irradiance

Panel efficiency is the percentage of incoming solar energy the panel converts to electricity. This is labeled on every panel's spec sheet under "Module Efficiency" or "Efficiency (%)." The solar irradiance field lets you see how output changes at different light levels — 1,000 W/m² is the standard test condition (STC) used to rate all panels. A typical clear sunny day peaks at 850-1,000 W/m².

Read the comparison table

The table shows all three technologies at your entered area and irradiance, making it easy to compare how much extra power monocrystalline delivers vs. polycrystalline or thin-film in the same panel footprint. The temperature coefficient column shows how each technology responds to heat — a key factor in hot climates.

The Formula

Panel output (W) = Panel area (m²) × Efficiency (%) × Irradiance (W/m²) STC output = Panel area × Efficiency × 1,000 W/m² Temperature-adjusted output = STC output × [1 + (Temp coefficient × (T − 25°C))]

The basic formula multiplies panel area by efficiency and incoming irradiance. At STC (1,000 W/m², 25°C), a 1.8 m² panel at 21.5% efficiency produces 1.8 × 0.215 × 1,000 = 387W — close to a real 400W panel rating.

The temperature coefficient matters on hot days. At 45°C (113°F), monocrystalline loses 0.35% × (45-25) = 7% output. The same heat reduces thin-film by only 5% (0.25% coefficient) — one of thin-film's advantages in hot climates like Arizona or the Middle East.

Technology Comparison

Same roof area, three technologies

This example compares how much a standard 20-panel array produces depending on technology, all at 1.8 m² per panel:

Monocrystalline (21.5%)387W/panel → 7,740W total
Polycrystalline (17.0%)306W/panel → 6,120W total
Thin-film (13.0%)234W/panel → 4,680W total

From the same 20-panel, 36 m² roof footprint, monocrystalline produces 65% more power than thin-film and 26% more than polycrystalline. For limited roof space, monocrystalline is clearly superior. Thin-film is primarily used in large commercial or utility-scale installations where land is cheap and installation simplicity (no frames, flexible mounting) matters more than efficiency.

FAQ

Monocrystalline panels are the most efficient for residential use in 2026. Top manufacturers like Maxeon (SunPower), REC Alpha, and Panasonic HIT/EverVolt achieve 22-24% efficiency. Standard monocrystalline panels range from 20-22%. N-type TOPCon and HJT (heterojunction) cell technology is now mainstream in premium panels, offering both high efficiency and lower temperature coefficients. Polycrystalline has largely been phased out of the residential market.
Higher efficiency means more power per square foot, which matters on small roofs. But for large roofs with unlimited space, a cheaper 18% panel may deliver the same total system output as a premium 22% panel at lower cost — just with more panels. Evaluate cost per watt produced over the system lifetime, not just efficiency percentage.
All solar panels lose efficiency as temperature rises above 25°C (77°F). Thin-film panels (especially CdTe from First Solar) have a lower temperature coefficient — typically -0.25%/°C vs. -0.35%/°C for monocrystalline. On a 45°C (113°F) roof, thin-film loses only 5% vs. 7% for monocrystalline. In practice, this advantage is real but rarely overcomes the 8-10% efficiency gap between technologies.
Panel efficiency is how well the panel converts sunlight to DC electricity — typically 18-24% for monocrystalline. System efficiency accounts for all additional losses: inverter conversion (AC/DC, ~97%), wiring resistance (~2%), temperature derating (~5%), soiling (~2%), and partial shading. A panel rated at 22% efficiency in a typical residential system produces power at 18-19% effective system efficiency, or an 86% derate factor.
Polycrystalline panels have largely been replaced by monocrystalline in 2025-2026. The manufacturing cost difference has shrunk to near zero while monocrystalline delivers 20-25% more power per panel. Most major manufacturers (Jinko, LONGi, Trina) have stopped producing polycrystalline panels for residential use. If a contractor quotes polycrystalline panels, ask why — it may indicate they're clearing old inventory.

Related Calculators